|
TCO Checklist:
Professional Development
How Much Should Be Budgeted?
|
Stay Updated on taking TCO to the classroom
|
|
Sign up now for the periodic taking TCO to the classroom newsletter!
|
|
The budget item that arguably is most critical to a school district's
ability to achieve its technology goals is staff development. If teachers
and other staff members do not understand how to use new technologies
and incorporate them into the classroom, a district's technological
investment will not achieve its desired results.
To underscore this point, the U.S. Department of Education has recommended
that school districts set aside 30 percent of their technology budgets
for staff training and development. Today many state departments of
education require that districts devote between 20 and 30 percent of
their state technology grant money to staff development.
In a 1995 school technology guide,
the Massachusetts Software Council pointed out that many businesses
match every dollar they spend on computer hardware or software with
another dollar for training. While it acknowledged that that figure
was probably too ambitious for most school districts, it recommended
that at least one-fourth of a school's technology budget be set aside
for that purpose.
One of the largest components of the cost of staff development is substitute
teachers, so that the teaching staff can be trained during their regular
work hours. In a well-publicized model
of school-technology costs, McKinsey & Co. assumed that a district planning
to network all of its classrooms would have to hire substitute teachers
at a cost of $100 a day, as well as the equivalent of 1.5 full-time
staff members to conduct training, and cover the cost of training materials.
Another model, developed
by Integrated Technology Education Group, LLC for the National Center
for Supercomputing Applications, calls for a minimum of five days of
training per year per teacher and two days per year per administrator,
as well as an additional six days per year of informal peer-to-peer
training. The model adopts 30 percent of the budget for staff training
as the goal to which districts should aspire, but considers 15 percent
to be the minimum acceptable.
A 1996 RAND study
of eight pioneering high-tech schools found that the cost of staff development
ranged from $15 to $35 per student per year, with most schools spending
about $25. As a share of their technology budgets, the percentages ranged
from 22 percent to 5.5 percent, with the average among them pegged at
about 10 percent.
Smart Valley, a recently concluded initiative by Silicon Valley companies
to network schools and other community institutions in that area, approached
the issue another way. It recommended in a school networking
guide
that "an average starting point" should be to allocate approximately
$1,500 per year for each person requiring training.
Meanwhile, the California Department of Education, in a four-year technology
plan, assumed that the typical school with 700 students and 33 staff
members would spend $2,000 per staff member for staff support, materials
and mileage and $35 an hour for trainers (with a projected 2,000 hours
required per school).
Inadequate staff training will lead to under-utilization of computers-and
a loss of return on a school district's investment in technology. A
survey of technology
directors conducted by the Milken Exchange found that on average, 5.9
percent of their district's computers were not being used. The second
most important reason why, cited by 50 percent of overall respondents,
was that "teachers are not trained to use them."
CEO Forum Report on Staff Development
In its second major report on the status of educational technology
in U.S. schools, the CEO Forum provides an overview of efforts to prepare
teachers to use technology and principles for successful professional
development in the area of technology. The report, "Professional Development:
A Link to Better Learning" can be accessed at www.ceoforum.org.
|